Game Blog Girl 🎮

You can’t really talk about dungeon crawlers without eventually landing on Wizardry — it’s one of the games the entire genre is built on top of. So when I found out it was a direct influence on Iron Abyss, it actually explained a lot about why the game feels the way it does. Descending Floor by Floor, On Purpose Wizardry’s whole structure is built around the dungeon as a place you methodically work through, level by level, learning its shape as you go. Iron Abyss keeps that bone-deep dungeon-crawler DNA intact — you’re descending through a sealed structure floor by floor, and the demo alone gives you procedurally-generated floors plus a handcrafted boss floor and a story floor. It’s not an open world pretending to be a dungeon crawler. It’s an actual descent, the way Wizardry always meant it. ...

Beast of Reincarnation just came out, and it’s a genuinely big deal — Game Freak’s first AAA game outside the Pokémon series, directed by someone who spent years on Pokémon’s battle systems and sound design. If you’ve been playing it, or you’re about to, I think you should have Iron Abyss on your radar too. Post-Apocalyptic Without a Clean Fix Beast of Reincarnation drops you into the year 4026, humanity on the edge of collapse, land corrupted by beasts nobody fully understands. Emma and Koo aren’t saving a healthy world, they’re surviving the wreckage of one that’s already mostly gone. Iron Abyss opens from the same emotional place — the world has ended, and you’re not trying to prevent that, you’re descending into what’s left of it to find out why. Neither game offers you the comfort of a world worth saving in its original state. You’re just trying to make sense of what’s left. ...

I didn’t expect to be making this comparison, but here we are: NieR: Automata and Iron Abyss are circling a lot of the same emotional territory, and once you notice it you can’t really unnotice it. Androids, Not Humans, Carrying the Story NieR: Automata’s whole gut-punch works because 2B, 9S, and A2 are androids grappling with something close to humanity in a world that doesn’t have humans left to validate it. Iron Abyss puts you in command of a three-pilot android crew doing something similar — descending into a sealed structure beneath a world that’s already ended, uncovering memories that were never meant to survive. Neither game needed human protagonists to make the loss land. If anything, the android distance makes it hit harder. ...

Usually when I write one of these comparisons, I’m the one connecting the dots. This time I don’t have to — OTR HVN has said flat out that BioShock shaped Iron Abyss, and once you know where to look, it’s obvious. It Starts With Echo Iron Abyss gives you five commanders to choose from, and Echo — the AI-designated one — is explicitly built on BioShock’s Big Daddy as a reference point. You can feel it the second it’s pointed out: something clearly built for a purpose, not entirely at ease in its own skin, more machine than person and all the more unsettling for it. If Big Daddies were the character in BioShock that stuck with you the longest, Echo is going to hit the same nerve. ...

I want to be upfront about something before I get into this one: System Shock and Iron Abyss are not the same kind of game. One’s a real-time immersive sim where you’re picking locks and hacking cameras, the other’s a turn-based mecha dungeon crawler. But the feeling both of them leave you with? That’s where it gets interesting. View this post on Instagram You’re Never Actually Looking at the World Directly This is the connection that hooked me. System Shock never lets you trust your own eyes completely — you’re piecing Citadel Station together through logs, cameras, SHODAN’s voice, a HUD that’s mediating everything. Iron Abyss does its own version of this literally: you watch the descent from the IRON ARK’s command deck, and everything renders as amber wireframe sensor data because the world outside is too sealed, too dark, too damaged to observe directly. Neither game gives you the comfort of just looking at things. You’re always looking at an interpretation. ...

Hellblade is one of those games people bring up whenever “sanity as a mechanic instead of a theme” comes up, and honestly, it should be. So when I started seeing it name-dropped in Iron Abyss discussions, I had to sit with why that comparison actually works. Sanity Isn’t Flavor Text in Either Game Hellblade built its whole identity around Senua’s psychosis being mechanically real — the whispers, the darkness creeping up her arm, the (fake, but terrifying at the time) permadeath threat tied to her corruption meter. It wasn’t a stat you glanced at, it was the game talking to you. Iron Abyss goes for something similar with its own sanity system: pilots accumulate insanity from combat losses and from perceiving things the IRON ARK’s sensors were never built to render, and it’s not sitting quietly in a menu — it’s shaping what you can actually do turn to turn. ...

I keep seeing Fear & Hunger come up in the same breath as Iron Abyss in comments and Discord threads, and the more I play, the more I get it. Different setting, different look entirely, but they’re chasing the same feeling in a way that’s hard to shake once you notice it. View this post on Instagram Descending Is the Whole Point Fear & Hunger doesn’t give you a quest log or a map that makes sense — it gives you a dungeon, a body, and the understanding that going down is the only direction that matters. Iron Abyss does the same thing structurally: you’re not clearing levels so much as descending through a sealed structure one floor at a time, and every floor is one more step you can’t take back. That framing alone does a lot of the horror’s heavy lifting before a single fight even starts. ...

Two things landed for Iron Abyss within days of each other, and I’m not over either one yet: OTR HVN dropped the official trailer, and the full game now has its own page on the studio’s store. Neither of those existed a few weeks ago. Launch is close enough now that this is starting to feel real. The Trailer Straight from the developer’s own channel: This is the clearest look yet at what the full 30-floor descent is actually going to feel like once the 3-floor demo isn’t the whole picture anymore — the amber wireframe sensor-view of the world, the IRON ARK’s command deck, the crew system, all of it moving instead of just described in a devlog post. Watch it a couple times, I did. ...

Okay, I need to talk about this one. Iron Abyss doesn’t even have its full release out yet and people are already making videos about it. Not a sponsored key, not a press event — just someone who played the demo and had things to say. The Video YouTuber Young Jiraiya sat down and walked through the v0.1.2 combat overhaul — the patch that reworked how fights actually feel in the demo, back when the game was still figuring itself out pre-launch: ...

Before every descent, Iron Abyss makes you pick a commander — and unlike a lot of games where that’s just a skin, this choice actually changes how the run plays out. Five options, five completely different vibes. Let’s go through them. Vex — Security Described by the devs as running on “M*A*S*H energy,” which honestly is the perfect shorthand — someone who’s clearly seen too much and copes with dark humor instead of unraveling. If you want a commander who holds the line and keeps everyone functional when things get bad, Vex is your person. ...